A port-Hamiltonian formulation of the Navier–Stokes equations for reactive flows

Authors

Abstract

We consider the problem of finding an energy-based formulation of the Navier–Stokes equations for reactive flows. These equations occur in various applications, e. g., in combustion engines or chemical reactors. After modeling, discretization, and model reduction, important system properties as the energy conservation are usually lost which may lead to unphysical simulation results. In this paper, we introduce a port-Hamiltonian formulation of the one-dimensional Navier–Stokes equations for reactive flows. The port-Hamiltonian structure is directly associated with an energy balance, which ensures that a temporal change of the total energy is only due to energy flows through the boundary. Furthermore, the boundary ports may be used for control purposes.

Keywords

energy-based modeling, hamiltonian formulation, navier–stokes equations, port-hamiltonian formulation, reactive flow

Citation

Journal: Systems & Control Letters
Year: 2017
Volume: 100
Issue:
Pages: 51–55
Publisher: Elsevier BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2016.12.005

BibTeX

@article{Altmann_2017,
  title={{A port-Hamiltonian formulation of the Navier–Stokes equations for reactive flows}},
  volume={100},
  ISSN={0167-6911},
  DOI={10.1016/j.sysconle.2016.12.005},
  journal={Systems \&amp; Control Letters},
  publisher={Elsevier BV},
  author={Altmann, R. and Schulze, P.},
  year={2017},
  pages={51--55}
}

Download the bib file

References

Borggaard, Model reduction for DAEs with an application to flow control. (2015)
Nagarajan U, Yamane K (2013) Automatic task-specific model reduction for humanoid robots. 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2578–258 – 10.1109/iros.2013.6696720
van der Schaft A, Jeltsema D (2014) Port-Hamiltonian Systems Theory: An Introductory Overview. Foundations and Trends® in Systems and Control 1(2–3):173–378. https://doi.org/10.1561/260000000 – 10.1561/2600000002
Olver, (1993)
Marsden, (1999)
Ennsbrunner H, Schlacher K On the geometrical representation and interconnection of infinite dimensional port controlled Hamiltonian systems. Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 5263–526 – 10.1109/cdc.2005.1582998
Schöberl M, Ennsbrunner H, Schlacher K (2008) Modelling of piezoelectric structures–a Hamiltonian approach. Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems 14(3):179–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/1387395070184482 – 10.1080/13873950701844824
Van der Schaft AJ, Maschke BM Fluid dynamical systems as Hamiltonian boundary control systems. Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.01CH37228) 5:4497–450 – 10.1109/cdc.2001.980911
Macchelli A, van der Schaft AJ, Melchiorri C (2004) Port Hamiltonian formulation of infinite dimensional systems I. Modeling. 2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601) 3762-3767 Vol. – 10.1109/cdc.2004.1429324
Kanatchikov IV (1998) Canonical structure of classical field theory in the polymomentum phase space. Reports on Mathematical Physics 41(1):49–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0034-4877(98)80182- – 10.1016/s0034-4877(98)80182-1
BRIDGES TJ (1997) Multi-symplectic structures and wave propagation. Math Proc Camb Phil Soc 121(1):147–190. https://doi.org/10.1017/s030500419600142 – 10.1017/s0305004196001429
Nishida G (2015) Hamiltonian Representation of Higher Order Partial Differential Equations with Boundary Energy Flows. JAMP 03(11):1472–1490. https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2015.31117 – 10.4236/jamp.2015.311174
Ramirez H, Maschke B, Sbarbaro D (2013) Irreversible port-Hamiltonian systems: A general formulation of irreversible processes with application to the CSTR. Chemical Engineering Science 89:223–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2012.12.00 – 10.1016/j.ces.2012.12.002
Morrison PJ, Greene JM (1980) Noncanonical Hamiltonian Density Formulation of Hydrodynamics and Ideal Magnetohydrodynamics. Phys Rev Lett 45(10):790–794. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.45.79 – 10.1103/physrevlett.45.790
Morrison, (1984)
Siuka, (2011)
Golo G, Talasila V, van der Schaft A, Maschke B (2004) Hamiltonian discretization of boundary control systems. Automatica 40(5):757–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2003.12.01 – 10.1016/j.automatica.2003.12.017
Seslija M, Scherpen JMA, van der Schaft A (2014) Explicit simplicial discretization of distributed-parameter port-Hamiltonian systems. Automatica 50(2):369–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2013.11.02 – 10.1016/j.automatica.2013.11.020
Beattie C, Gugercin S (2011) Structure-preserving model reduction for nonlinear port-Hamiltonian systems. IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference 6564–656 – 10.1109/cdc.2011.6161504
Polyuga RV, van der Schaft A (2011) Structure Preserving Moment Matching for Port-Hamiltonian Systems: Arnoldi and Lanczos. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 56(6):1458–1462. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.2011.212865 – 10.1109/tac.2011.2128650
Warnatz, (2006)
Zhou W, Hamroun B, Gorrec YL, Couenne F (2015) Infinite Dimensional Port Hamiltonian Representation of reaction diffusion processes. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48(1):476–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.05.11 – 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.05.119
Tartar, (2007)
Sutherland JC, Kennedy CA (2003) Improved boundary conditions for viscous, reacting, compressible flows. Journal of Computational Physics 191(2):502–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9991(03)00328- – 10.1016/s0021-9991(03)00328-0