Interconnection structure preservation design for a type of port‐controlled hamiltonian systems—A parametric approach
Authors
Abstract
It is a very important issue to minimise the change of the interconnect structure matrix when stabilising a port‐controlled Hamiltonian (PCH) system. Toward this problem, a parametric design method is proposed in this paper for a type of PCH systems. First, concepts of H‐damping‐assignable and H‐damping‐assigning controller are introduced, and the stability of the closed‐loop system resulting from this type of controller is discussed. Secondly, a necessary and sufficient condition for the system to be H‐damping‐assignable is given, and, when this condition is met, a parametric general expression of all the H‐damping‐assigning controllers is obtained. Thirdly, the free parameters are optimised to minimize the change of the interconnect structure matrix and also the norm of the control gain matrix. The parameter optimisation is formulated as a standard quadratic programming problem, to which analytical solutions are obtained. Finally, comparative simulations are carried out for a numerical example to verify the effect and the superiority of the proposed method.
Citation
- Journal: IET Control Theory & Applications
- Year: 2021
- Volume: 15
- Issue: 3
- Pages: 338–347
- Publisher: Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
- DOI: 10.1049/cth2.12046
BibTeX
@article{Zhao_2020,
title={{Interconnection structure preservation design for a type of port‐controlled hamiltonian systems—A parametric approach}},
volume={15},
ISSN={1751-8652},
DOI={10.1049/cth2.12046},
number={3},
journal={IET Control Theory \& Applications},
publisher={Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)},
author={Zhao, Tianyi and Duan, Guangren},
year={2020},
pages={338--347}
}References
- Maschke, B. M. & van der Schaft, A. J. Port-Controlled Hamiltonian Systems: Modelling Origins and Systemtheoretic Properties. IFAC Proceedings Volumes 25, 359–365 (1992) – 10.1016/s1474-6670(17)52308-3
- Transient stabilization of multimachine power systems with nontrivial transfer conductances. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 50, 60–75 (2005) – 10.1109/tac.2004.840477
- Wang, Y., Feng, G., Cheng, D. & Liu, Y. Adaptive \(L_{2}\) disturbance attenuation control of multi-machine power systems with SMES units. Automatica 42, 1121–1132 (2006) – 10.1016/j.automatica.2006.03.014
- Mei, S., Shen, T., Hu, W., Lu, Q. & Sun, L. Robus control of a Hamiltonian system with uncertainty and its application to a multi-machine power system. IEE Proc., Control Theory Appl. 152, 202–210 (2005) – 10.1049/ip-cta:20041121
- Shi, F. & Wang, J. Stabilising control of multi-machine power systems with transmission losses based on pseudo-generalised Hamiltonian theory. IET Control Theory Appl. 6, 173–181 (2012) – 10.1049/iet-cta.2011.0063
- Maithripala, D. H. S., Berg, J. M. & Dayawansa, W. P. Control of an Electrostatic Microelectromechanical System Using Static and Dynamic Output Feedback. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 127, 443–450 (2004) – 10.1115/1.1985443
- Yang, T., Yu, S. & Yan, Y. Formation control of multiple underwater vehicles subject to communication faults and uncertainties. Applied Ocean Research 82, 109–116 (2019) – 10.1016/j.apor.2018.10.024
- Dòria-Cerezo, A., Batlle, C. & Espinosa-Pérez, G. Passivity-based control of a wound-rotor synchronous motor. IET Control Theory Appl. 4, 2049–2057 (2010) – 10.1049/iet-cta.2009.0641
- Ortega, R., van der Schaft, A. J. & Maschke, B. M. Stabilization of port-controlled Hamiltonian systems via energy balancing. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences 239–260 (1999) doi:10.1007/1-84628-577-1_13 – 10.1007/1-84628-577-1_13
- Putting energy back in control. IEEE Control Syst. 21, 18–33 (2001) – 10.1109/37.915398
- Ortega, R., van der Schaft, A., Maschke, B. & Escobar, G. Interconnection and damping assignment passivity-based control of port-controlled Hamiltonian systems. Automatica 38, 585–596 (2002) – 10.1016/s0005-1098(01)00278-3
- Cupelli, M. et al. Port Controlled Hamiltonian Modeling and IDA-PBC Control of Dual Active Bridge Converters for DC Microgrids. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 66, 9065–9075 (2019) – 10.1109/tie.2019.2901645
- Benmouna, A., Becherif, M., Chen, J., Chen, H. & Depernet, D. Interconnection and damping assignment passivity based control for fuel cell and battery vehicle: Simulation and experimentation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 44, 22467–22477 (2019) – 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.02.045
- Serra, D. et al. Control of Nonprehensile Planar Rolling Manipulation: A Passivity-Based Approach. IEEE Trans. Robot. 35, 317–329 (2019) – 10.1109/tro.2018.2887356
- Nunna, K., Sassano, M. & Astolfi, A. Constructive Interconnection and Damping Assignment for Port-Controlled Hamiltonian Systems. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 60, 2350–2361 (2015) – 10.1109/tac.2015.2400663
- Sun, W. & Fu, B. Adaptive control of time‐varying uncertain non‐linear systems with input delay: a Hamiltonian approach. IET Control Theory & Appl 10, 1844–1858 (2016) – 10.1049/iet-cta.2015.1165
- Fujimoto, K., Sakurama, K. & Sugie, T. Trajectory tracking control of port-controlled Hamiltonian systems via generalized canonical transformations. Automatica 39, 2059–2069 (2003) – 10.1016/j.automatica.2003.07.005
- Qureshi, A., El Ferik, S. & Lewis, F. L. ℒ2 neuro‐adaptive tracking control of uncertain port‐controlled Hamiltonian systems. IET Control Theory & Appl 9, 1781–1790 (2015) – 10.1049/iet-cta.2014.1144
- Wang, Z. & Goldsmith, P. Modified energy-balancing-based control for the tracking problem. IET Control Theory Appl. 2, 310–322 (2008) – 10.1049/iet-cta:20070124
- Wang, Y., Feng, G. & Cheng, D. Simultaneous stabilization of a set of nonlinear port-controlled Hamiltonian systems. Automatica 43, 403–415 (2007) – 10.1016/j.automatica.2006.09.008
- Yang, R. & Wang, Y. Finite-time stability analysis and \(H_{\infty}\) control for a class of nonlinear time-delay Hamiltonian systems. Automatica 49, 390–401 (2013) – 10.1016/j.automatica.2012.11.034
- Lee, S., Oh, K. & Ahn, H. Passivity‐based output synchronisation of port‐controlled Hamiltonian and general linear interconnected systems. IET Control Theory & Appl 7, 234–245 (2013) – 10.1049/iet-cta.2012.0661
- Prajna, S., van der Schaft, A. & Meinsma, G. An LMI approach to stabilization of linear port-controlled Hamiltonian systems. Systems & Control Letters 45, 371–385 (2002) – 10.1016/s0167-6911(01)00195-5
- Dalsmo, M. & van der Schaft, A. On Representations and Integrability of Mathematical Structures in Energy-Conserving Physical Systems. SIAM J. Control Optim. 37, 54–91 (1998) – 10.1137/s0363012996312039
- van der Schaft, A. L2 - Gain and Passivity Techniques in Nonlinear Control. Communications and Control Engineering (Springer London, 2000). doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-0507-7 – 10.1007/978-1-4471-0507-7
- Stramigioli, S., Maschke, B. & van der Schaft, A. Passive Output Feedback and Port Interconnection. IFAC Proceedings Volumes 31, 591–596 (1998) – 10.1016/s1474-6670(17)40401-0
- WANG, Y. New approaches to generalized Hamiltonian realization of autonomous nonlinear systems. Sci China Ser F 46, 431 (2003) – 10.1360/02yf0160
- Zhao, T. & Duan, G. Stabilization via output feedback for a type of uncertain time-varying port-controlled Hamiltonian system based on linear matrix inequality approach. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control 41, 4387–4397 (2019) – 10.1177/0142331219858795
- Horn, R. A. & Johnson, C. R. Matrix Analysis. (2012) doi:10.1017/cbo9781139020411 – 10.1017/cbo9781139020411
- Piao, F., Zhang, Q. & Wang, Z. The solution to matrix equation AX+XTC=B. Journal of the Franklin Institute 344, 1056–1062 (2007) – 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2007.05.002