Authors

Alex Arenas, Oriol Artime, Albert Díaz‐Guilera, Sergio Gómez, Clara Granell

Abstract

Many complex systems cannot be understood from network structure alone, nor from continuum descriptions in isolation, because their dynamics emerge from the reciprocal coupling between discrete interaction architectures and spatially extended physical fields. This perspective article surveys mathematical and computational frameworks for such network–field systems, focusing on models in which a graph is either itself the spatial substrate of a field or is embedded in a surrounding medium that mediates transport, signaling, forcing, or spatially distributed hazards. We first introduce a unified formalism for bidirectionally coupled network–field dynamics, emphasizing observation and injection operators that link node variables to continuum processes while preserving balance laws. We then examine two major modeling classes: fields evolving directly on metric graphs, where partial differential equations are posed on network geometries with vertex matching conditions; and hybrid discrete–continuous systems, where node dynamics are coupled to fields in the ambient domain, with particular attention to port‐Hamiltonian formulations that provide energy‐consistent interconnection principles. Within this common framework, we discuss representative modeling applications in neurobiology, including diffusion‐mediated cellular communication and extracellular neural signaling, and in infrastructure systems, where network functionality depends on spatially distributed flows, loads, and hazards. Across these examples, a common picture emerges: the field is not merely an external environment, but an active dynamical layer that reshapes effective interactions, timescales, and collective behavior. By synthesizing concepts that are often developed separately across disciplines, this perspective article aims to clarify the mathematical structure, physical interpretation, and numerical challenges of coupled network–field models, and to highlight their role as a unifying language for spatially embedded complex systems.

Citation

  • Journal: Annalen der Physik
  • Year: 2026
  • Volume: 538
  • Issue: 9
  • Pages: e70288
  • Publisher: Wiley
  • DOI: 10.1002/andp.70288

BibTeX

@article{Arenas_2026,
  title={{Coupled Dynamics Between Networks and Fields in Physical Space: A Theoretical Perspective}},
  volume={538},
  ISSN={1521-3889},
  DOI={10.1002/andp.70288},
  number={9},
  journal={Annalen der Physik},
  publisher={Wiley},
  author={Arenas, Alex and Artime, Oriol and Díaz‐Guilera, Albert and Gómez, Sergio and Granell, Clara},
  year={2026}
}

Download the bib file

References

  • Barthélemy M (2011) Spatial networks. Physics Reports 499(1–3):1–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2010.11.002 – 10.1016/j.physrep.2010.11.002
  • Bullmore E, Sporns O (2012) The economy of brain network organization. Nat Rev Neurosci 13(5):336–349. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3214 – 10.1038/nrn3214
  • Kivela M, Arenas A, Barthelemy M, Gleeson JP, Moreno Y, Porter MA (2014) Multilayer networks. Journal of Complex Networks 2(3):203–271. https://doi.org/10.1093/comnet/cnu016 – 10.1093/comnet/cnu016
  • Barbosa H, Barthelemy M, Ghoshal G, James CR, Lenormand M, Louail T, Menezes R, Ramasco JJ, Simini F, Tomasini M (2018) Human mobility: Models and applications. Physics Reports 734:1–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2018.01.001 – 10.1016/j.physrep.2018.01.001
  • 10.1016/s0197‐0186(99)00137‐0
  • Anastassiou CA, Koch C (2015) Ephaptic coupling to endogenous electric field activity: why bother? Current Opinion in Neurobiology 31:95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2014.09.002 – 10.1016/j.conb.2014.09.002
  • Larsen BR, Stoica A, MacAulay N (2016) Managing Brain Extracellular K+ during Neuronal Activity: The Physiological Role of the Na+/K+-ATPase Subunit Isoforms. Front Physiol 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2016.00141 – 10.3389/fphys.2016.00141
  • 10.1038/s41380‐024‐02608‐3
  • Hu X, Hall JW, Shi P, Lim WH (2015) The spatial exposure of the Chinese infrastructure system to flooding and drought hazards. Nat Hazards 80(2):1083–1118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-2012-3 – 10.1007/s11069-015-2012-3
  • Shen Z, Ji C, Lu S (2024) Transportation network resilience response to the spatial feature of hazards. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 128:104121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2024.104121 – 10.1016/j.trd.2024.104121
  • Mühlhofer E, Bresch DN, Koks EE (2024) Infrastructure failure cascades quintuple risk of storm and flood-induced service disruptions across the globe. One Earth 7(4):714–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2024.03.010 – 10.1016/j.oneear.2024.03.010
  • Stéphanou A, Volpert V (2015) Hybrid Modelling in Biology: a Classification Review. Math Model Nat Phenom 11(1):37–48. https://doi.org/10.1051/mmnp/201611103 – 10.1051/mmnp/201611103
  • Ingram GD, Cameron IT, Hangos KM (2004) Classification and analysis of integrating frameworks in multiscale modelling. Chemical Engineering Science 59(11):2171–2187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2004.02.010 – 10.1016/j.ces.2004.02.010
  • Barzel B, Barabási A-L (2013) Universality in network dynamics. Nature Phys 9(10):673–681. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2741 – 10.1038/nphys2741
  • Brio M, Caputo J-G, Kravitz H (2022) Spectral solutions of PDEs on networks. Applied Numerical Mathematics 172:99–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnum.2021.09.021 – 10.1016/j.apnum.2021.09.021
  • Kravitz H, Brio M, Caputo J-G (2023) Localized eigenvectors on metric graphs. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 214:352–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2023.07.011 – 10.1016/j.matcom.2023.07.011
  • Böttcher L, Porter MA (2025) Dynamical Processes on Metric Networks. SIAM J Appl Dyn Syst 24(4):2848–2885. https://doi.org/10.1137/24m1628153 – 10.1137/24m1628153
  • Daafouz J, Tucsnak M, Valein J (2014) Nonlinear control of a coupled PDE/ODE system modeling a switched power converter with a transmission line. Systems & Control Letters 70:92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysconle.2014.05.009 – 10.1016/j.sysconle.2014.05.009
  • 10.1016/j.apm.2020.07.038
  • 10.1016/s0393‐0440(01)00083‐3
  • Le Gorrec Y, Zwart H, Maschke B (2005) Dirac structures and Boundary Control Systems associated with Skew-Symmetric Differential Operators. SIAM J Control Optim 44(5):1864–1892. https://doi.org/10.1137/040611677 – 10.1137/040611677
  • van der Schaft A, Jeltsema D (2014) Port-Hamiltonian Systems Theory: An Introductory Overview. Foundations and Trends® in Systems and Control 1(2–3):173–378. https://doi.org/10.1561/2600000002 – 10.1561/2600000002
  • W. G.Faris “Partial Differential Equations ” (1999) Lecture notes Department of Mathematics University of Arizona. Accessed 2026‐05‐22.
  • F. L.Cardoso‐Ribeiro D.Matignon andV.Pommier‐Budinger “Modeling by Interconnection and Control by Damping Injection of a Fluid‐Structure System With Non‐Collocated Actuators and Sensors ” inProceedings of the International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering (ISMA 2016).
  • Golo G, Talasila V, van der Schaft A, Maschke B (2004) Hamiltonian discretization of boundary control systems. Automatica 40(5):757–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2003.12.017 – 10.1016/j.automatica.2003.12.017
  • 10.1515/cmam‐2020‐0025
  • Silva FA dos S, Lopes SR, Viana RL (2016) Synchronization of biological clock cells with a coupling mediated by the local concentration of a diffusing substance. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 35:37–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2015.11.003 – 10.1016/j.cnsns.2015.11.003
  • Forger DB, Jewett ME, Kronauer RE (1999) A Simpler Model of the Human Circadian Pacemaker. J Biol Rhythms 14(6):533–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/074873099129000867 – 10.1177/074873099129000867
  • Kuramoto Y, Nakao H (1996) Origin of Power-Law Spatial Correlations in Distributed Oscillators and Maps with Nonlocal Coupling. Phys Rev Lett 76(23):4352–4355. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.76.4352 – 10.1103/physrevlett.76.4352
  • 10.1016/s0167‐2789(96)00264‐3
  • Nakao H (1999) Anomalous spatio-temporal chaos in a two-dimensional system of nonlocally coupled oscillators. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 9(4):902–909. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.166463 – 10.1063/1.166463
  • 10.1007/s11071‐020‐05700‐9
  • Gonze D, Bernard S, Waltermann C, Kramer A, Herzel H (2005) Spontaneous Synchronization of Coupled Circadian Oscillators. Biophysical Journal 89(1):120–129. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.104.058388 – 10.1529/biophysj.104.058388
  • Bernard S, Gonze D, Čajavec B, Herzel H, Kramer A (2007) Synchronization-Induced Rhythmicity of Circadian Oscillators in the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus. PLoS Comput Biol 3(4):e68. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030068 – 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030068
  • Myung J, Hong S, DeWoskin D, De Schutter E, Forger DB, Takumi T (2015) GABA-mediated repulsive coupling between circadian clock neurons in the SCN encodes seasonal time. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(29). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1421200112 – 10.1073/pnas.1421200112
  • Tokuda IT, Ono D, Honma S, Honma K-I, Herzel H (2018) Coherency of circadian rhythms in the SCN is governed by the interplay of two coupling factors. PLoS Comput Biol 14(12):e1006607. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006607 – 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006607
  • Tuckwell HC, Miura RM (1978) A mathematical model for spreading cortical depression. Biophysical Journal 23(2):257–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3495(78)85447-2 – 10.1016/s0006-3495(78)85447-2
  • Kager H, Wadman WJ, Somjen GG (2000) Simulated Seizures and Spreading Depression in a Neuron Model Incorporating Interstitial Space and Ion Concentrations. Journal of Neurophysiology 84(1):495–512. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.2000.84.1.495 – 10.1152/jn.2000.84.1.495
  • Yao W, Huang H, Miura RM (2011) A Continuum Neuronal Model for the Instigation and Propagation of Cortical Spreading Depression. Bull Math Biol 73(11):2773–2790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-011-9647-3 – 10.1007/s11538-011-9647-3
  • Chang JC, Brennan KC, He D, Huang H, Miura RM, Wilson PL, Wylie JJ (2013) A Mathematical Model of the Metabolic and Perfusion Effects on Cortical Spreading Depression. PLoS ONE 8(8):e70469. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070469 – 10.1371/journal.pone.0070469
  • Somjen GG (2001) Mechanisms of Spreading Depression and Hypoxic Spreading Depression-Like Depolarization. Physiological Reviews 81(3):1065–1096. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.2001.81.3.1065 – 10.1152/physrev.2001.81.3.1065
  • Artime O, Grassia M, De Domenico M, Gleeson JP, Makse HA, Mangioni G, Perc M, Radicchi F (2024) Robustness and resilience of complex networks. Nat Rev Phys 6(2):114–131. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-023-00676-y – 10.1038/s42254-023-00676-y
  • Scagliarini T, Artime O, De Domenico M (2025) Assessing the vulnerability of empirical infrastructure networks to natural catastrophes. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 191:115813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115813 – 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115813
  • Mikaberidze G, Artime O, Díaz-Guilera A, D’Souza RM (2025) Multiscale Field Theory for Network Flows. Phys Rev X 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevx.15.021044 – 10.1103/physrevx.15.021044