Geometric spatial reduction for port-Hamiltonian systems

Authors

Ngoc Minh Trang Vu, Laurent Lefèvre, Bernhard Maschke

Abstract

A geometric spatial reduction method is presented in this paper. It applies to port Hamiltonian models for open systems of balance equations. It is based on projections which make use of the spatial symmetries in the model and preserve the “natural” power pairing. Reductions from 3D to 2D and 1D domains are illustrated via two examples. The first one is a vibro-acoustic system with cylindrical symmetry where 3D–2D reduction is applied. The second one is the system of two coupled parabolic equations describing the poloidal magnetic flux diffusion and heat radial transport in tokamak reactors. In this latter example the toroidal symmetry allows to perform a 3D–1D reduction. Obtained reduced models are compared with the common control models found in the literature for these two examples.

Keywords

distributed parameters systems, geometric reduction, port hamiltonian systems, tokamak plasma control, vibro-acoustic system

Citation

• Journal: Systems & Control Letters
• Year: 2019
• Volume: 125
• Issue:
• Pages: 1–8
• Publisher: Elsevier BV
• DOI: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2019.01.002

BibTeX

@article{Vu_2019,
  title={{Geometric spatial reduction for port-Hamiltonian systems}},
  volume={125},
  ISSN={0167-6911},
  DOI={10.1016/j.sysconle.2019.01.002},
  journal={Systems \& Control Letters},
  publisher={Elsevier BV},
  author={Vu, Ngoc Minh Trang and Lefèvre, Laurent and Maschke, Bernhard},
  year={2019},
  pages={1--8}
}

Download the bib file

References

• Marsden JE, Ratiu T (1986) Reduction of Poisson manifolds. Lett Math Phys 11(2):161–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0039842 – 10.1007/bf00398428
• Marsden JE, Ratiu T, Weinstein A (1984) Reduction and Hamiltonian structures on duals of semidirect product Lie algebras. Contemporary Mathematics 55–10 – 10.1090/conm/028/751975
• Blankenstein G, van der Schaft AJ (2001) Symmetry and reduction in implicit generalized Hamiltonian systems. Reports on Mathematical Physics 47(1):57–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0034-4877(01)90006- – 10.1016/s0034-4877(01)90006-0
• BRIDGES TJ (1997) Multi-symplectic structures and wave propagation. Math Proc Camb Phil Soc 121(1):147–190. https://doi.org/10.1017/s030500419600142 – 10.1017/s0305004196001429
• Reich S (2000) Multi-Symplectic Runge–Kutta Collocation Methods for Hamiltonian Wave Equations. Journal of Computational Physics 157(2):473–499. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1999.637 – 10.1006/jcph.1999.6372
• Bridges TJ, Reich S (2001) Multi-symplectic integrators: numerical schemes for Hamiltonian PDEs that conserve symplecticity. Physics Letters A 284(4–5):184–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0375-9601(01)00294- – 10.1016/s0375-9601(01)00294-8
• Hairer, (2002)
• van der Schaft AJ, Maschke BM (2002) Hamiltonian formulation of distributed-parameter systems with boundary energy flow. Journal of Geometry and Physics 42(1–2):166–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0393-0440(01)00083- – 10.1016/s0393-0440(01)00083-3
• Kotyczka P, Maschke B, Lefèvre L (2018) Weak form of Stokes–Dirac structures and geometric discretization of port-Hamiltonian systems. Journal of Computational Physics 361:442–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.02.00 – 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.02.006
• Collet M, David P, Berthillier M (2009) Active acoustical impedance using distributed electrodynamical transducers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125(2):882–894. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.302632 – 10.1121/1.3026329
• Collet, Semi-active optimization of 2D waves dispersion into shunted piezocomposite systems for controlling acoustic interaction. (2011)
• Vu NMT, Lefèvre L, Maschke B (2016) A structured control model for the thermo-magneto-hydrodynamics of plasmas in tokamaks. Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems 22(3):181–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/13873954.2016.115487 – 10.1080/13873954.2016.1154874
• Cohen, The topology of fiber bundles. Lect. Notes (1998)
• Bott, (1982)
• Audin, (2004)
• Frankel, (2004)
• Wesson, (2004)
• (2005) Fusion, tokamaks, and plasma control: an introduction and tutorial. IEEE Control Syst 25(5):30–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcs.2005.151279 – 10.1109/mcs.2005.1512794
• (2006) Emerging applications in tokamak plasma control. IEEE Control Syst 26(2):35–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcs.2006.161527 – 10.1109/mcs.2006.1615272
• Ariola, Magnetic control of tokamak plasmas. (2008)
• Blum, (1989)
• VU NMT, LEFEVRE L, NOUAILLETAS R, BREMOND S (2013) Geometric discretization for a plasma control model. IFAC Proceedings Volumes 46(2):755–760. https://doi.org/10.3182/20130204-3-fr-2033.0009 – 10.3182/20130204-3-fr-2033.00098
• Ngoc-Minh-Trang Vu, Nouailletas R, Lefevre L, Bremond S (2013) An IDA-PBC approach for the control of 1D plasma profile in tokamaks. 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 4176–418 – 10.1109/cdc.2013.6760530
• Macchelli, Modeling and control of complex physical systems - the port-hamiltonian approach. (2009)
• Felici F, Sauter O (2012) Non-linear model-based optimization of actuator trajectories for tokamak plasma profile control. Plasma Phys Control Fusion 54(2):025002. https://doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/54/2/02500 – 10.1088/0741-3335/54/2/025002
• Vu NMT, Lefèvre L, Nouailletas R, Brémond S (2017) Symplectic spatial integration schemes for systems of balance equations. Journal of Process Control 51:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2016.12.00 – 10.1016/j.jprocont.2016.12.005
• Seslija M, Scherpen JMA, van der Schaft A (2014) Explicit simplicial discretization of distributed-parameter port-Hamiltonian systems. Automatica 50(2):369–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2013.11.02 – 10.1016/j.automatica.2013.11.020