Authors

Erol Can

Abstract

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are increasingly deployed in complex, safety–critical missions where robust control under environmental uncertainties—such as in-flight icing and sensor noise—is essential. These disturbances degrade aerodynamic performance, flight stability, and tracking accuracy, challenging conventional control methods. This paper presents a novel control framework that synergistically integrates a fuzzy logic controller (FLC) with online adaptive tuning via Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), embedded within a port-Hamiltonian (PH) modeling structure. The PH framework ensures physically consistent, energy-aware representation of UAV dynamics, enabling rigorous Lyapunov-based stability analysis and passivity guarantees. The key innovation lies in combining adaptive fuzzy control with an energy-based PH system model, which together enhance robustness against complex, nonlinear disturbances, such as icing and sensor noise, while simultaneously optimizing energy efficiency. Extensive simulations under realistic environmental and parametric uncertainties demonstrate significant improvements over traditional PID and standalone fuzzy controllers, including up to 85.7% reduction in altitude tracking error and 31.6% decrease in total energy consumption. Importantly, the approach maintains computational tractability by employing a simplified planar 3-DOF model focusing on translational and pitch dynamics—acknowledged as a main limitation and direction for future work. This integrated methodology advances the state-of-the-art by bridging adaptive intelligent control with rigorous physics-based modeling, providing a scalable and robust solution for next-generation autonomous UAVs operating safely in uncertain and adverse conditions.

Keywords

autonomous systems, fuzzy logic, icing effects, intelligent flight control, nonlinear systems, particle swarm optimization, port-hamiltonian systems, robust adaptive control, stability analysis, uav control

Citation

  • Journal: International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences
  • Year: 2025
  • Volume:
  • Issue:
  • Pages:
  • Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
  • DOI: 10.1007/s42405-025-01087-2

BibTeX

@article{Can_2025,
  title={{Energy-Aware Adaptive Altitude Control of UAVs via Fuzzy–PSO Optimization Within a Port-Hamiltonian Framework Under Icing and Sensor Noise}},
  ISSN={2093-2480},
  DOI={10.1007/s42405-025-01087-2},
  journal={International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences},
  publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC},
  author={Can, Erol},
  year={2025}
}

Download the bib file

References

  • Lyu M, Zhao Y, Huang C, Huang H (2023) Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Search and Rescue: A Survey. Remote Sensing 15(13):3266. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs1513326 – 10.3390/rs15133266
  • Mohsan SAH, Othman NQH, Li Y, Alsharif MH, Khan MA (2023) Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs): practical aspects, applications, open challenges, security issues, and future trends. Intel Serv Robotics 16(1):109–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-022-00452- – 10.1007/s11370-022-00452-4
  • Amrallah A, Mohamed EM, Tran GK, Sakaguchi K (2023) UAV Trajectory Optimization in a Post-Disaster Area Using Dual Energy-Aware Bandits. Sensors 23(3):1402. https://doi.org/10.3390/s2303140 – 10.3390/s23031402
  • Beard RW, McLain TW (2012) Small Unmanned Aircraf – 10.1515/9781400840601
  • Jing Y, Wang X, Heredia-Juesas J, Fortner C, Giacomo C, Sipahi R, Martinez-Lorenzo J (2022) PX4 Simulation Results of a Quadcopter with a Disturbance-Observer-Based and PSO-Optimized Sliding Mode Surface Controller. Drones 6(9):261. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones609026 – 10.3390/drones6090261
  • B Etkin, Dynamics of atmospheric flight (2012)
  • Stevens BL, Lewis FL, Johnson EN (2015) Aircraft Control and Simulation: Dynamics, Controls Design, and Autonomous System – 10.1002/9781119174882
  • A Selma, Performance comparison of PSO-based fuzzy control in UAVs (2020)
  • Kumar A (2020) Development of Fast and Soft Landing System for Quadcopter Drone using Fuzzy Logic Technology. IJATCSE 9(1):624–629. https://doi.org/10.30534/ijatcse/2020/8791202 – 10.30534/ijatcse/2020/87912020
  • Tang HH, Ahmad NS (2024) Fuzzy logic approach for controlling uncertain and nonlinear systems: a comprehensive review of applications and advances. Systems Science & Control Engineering 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/21642583.2024.239442 – 10.1080/21642583.2024.2394429
  • B Ma, IEEE Trans Instrum Meas (2023)
  • Shami TM, El-Saleh AA, Alswaitti M, Al-Tashi Q, Summakieh MA, Mirjalili S (2022) Particle Swarm Optimization: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Access 10:10031–10061. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.314285 – 10.1109/access.2022.3142859
  • Hussain A, Li S, Hussain T, Attar RW, Ali F, Alhomoud A, Shah B (2024) Integrated Energy-Efficient Distributed Link Stability Algorithm for UAV Networks. CMC 81(2):2357–2394. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2024.05669 – 10.32604/cmc.2024.056694
  • Ahmed M, Soofi AA, Khan F, Raza S, Khan WU, Su L, Xu F, Han Z (2025) Toward a Sustainable Low-Altitude Economy: A Survey of Energy-Efficient RIS-UAV Networks. IEEE Internet Things J :1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2025.361848 – 10.1109/jiot.2025.3618483
  • Amer TS, Amer WS, Fakharany M, Elneklawy AH, El-Kafly HF (2025) Modeling of the Euler-Poisson Equations for Rigid Bodies in the Context of the Gyrostatic Influences: An Innovative Methodology. Eur J Pure Appl Math 18(1):5712. https://doi.org/10.29020/nybg.ejpam.v18i1.571 – 10.29020/nybg.ejpam.v18i1.5712
  • Amer T, Elneklawy A, El-Kafly H (2025) Dynamical motion of a spacecraft containing a slug and influenced by a gyrostatic moment and constant torques. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control 44(3):1708–1725. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461348425132223 – 10.1177/14613484251322235
  • Amer T, El-Kafly H, Elneklawy A, Galal A (2025) Stability analysis of a rotating rigid body: The role of external and gyroscopic torques with energy dissipation. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control 44(3):1502–1515. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461348425132458 – 10.1177/14613484251324586
  • Amer TS, Alanazy A, Elneklawy AH, Amer WS, El-Kafly HF (2026) Asymptotic solutions for the 3D motion of asymmetric charged gyrostatic satellite using poincaré small parameter technique. Aerospace Science and Technology 168:110764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2025.11076 – 10.1016/j.ast.2025.110764
  • Elneklawy AH, Amer TS, Alanazy A, El-Kafly HF, Sallam AA (2025) Nonlinear dynamical behavior of a three-degree-of-freedom asymmetric rigid body under gyroscopic torque. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461348425138506 – 10.1177/14613484251385065
  • T Oktay, Int J Mech Aerosp Ind Mechatron Manuf Eng (2016)
  • ÜNAL N, ÖZ Y, ÜNAL EA, OKTAY T (2025) Enhancing aerodynamic performance of a two-dimensional airfoil using plasma actuators. Aerospace Science and Technology 158:109882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2024.10988 – 10.1016/j.ast.2024.109882
  • Şahin H (2025) Multi-objective stochastical revision of piston-prop MUAV for maximization of autonomous performance, range, endurance and ceiling altitude. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering 239(12):1451–1463. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410025133284 – 10.1177/09544100251332842
  • Panda S, Padhy NP (2008) Comparison of particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm for FACTS-based controller design. Applied Soft Computing 8(4):1418–1427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2007.10.00 – 10.1016/j.asoc.2007.10.009