Control using new passivity property with differentiation at both ports

Authors

Krishna Chaitanya Kosaraju, Ramkrishna Pasumarthy, N.M. Singh, Alexander L. Fradkov

Abstract

Port Hamiltonian systems are usually passive with respect to port variables that are power conjugate (eg: voltage and current, force and velocity) and this lead to energy shaping control methods. But systems with ‘dissipation obstacle’ cannot be controlled using these port variables and therefore we need to search for alternative passive maps. One option is within the Brayton Moser framework, where passivity is obtained by differentiating one of the port variables. This has led to power shaping methods for control, but the solutions (if exists) obtained impose constraints on the physical parameters of the system. In this paper, starting from the Brayton Moser framework we present a new passivity property with differentiation at both the port variables. Further using this new passive map, a PI like controller is proposed and presented using parallel RLC circuit and transmission line system with non zero boundary conditions as examples.

Citation

• Journal: 2017 Indian Control Conference (ICC)
• Year: 2017
• Volume:
• Issue:
• Pages: 7–11
• Publisher: IEEE
• DOI: 10.1109/indiancc.2017.7846443

BibTeX

@inproceedings{Kosaraju_2017,
  title={{Control using new passivity property with differentiation at both ports}},
  DOI={10.1109/indiancc.2017.7846443},
  booktitle={{2017 Indian Control Conference (ICC)}},
  publisher={IEEE},
  author={Kosaraju, Krishna Chaitanya and Pasumarthy, Ramkrishna and Singh, N.M. and Fradkov, Alexander L.},
  year={2017},
  pages={7--11}
}

Download the bib file

References

• Kosaraju, K. C. & Pasumarthy, R. Power-Based Methods for Infinite-Dimensional Systems. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences 277–301 (2015) doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20988-3_15 – 10.1007/978-3-319-20988-3_15
• kosaraju, Alternative passive maps for infinite-dimensional systems using mixed-potential functions. IFAC Workshop Lagrangian Hamiltonian Methods Nonlinear Control (2015)
• luo, Stability and Stabilization of Infinite Dimensional Systems with Applications (1990)
• Putting energy back in control. IEEE Control Syst. 21, 18–33 (2001) – 10.1109/37.915398
• pasumarthy, On power balancing and stabilization for a class of infinite-dimensional systems. Proc Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems (2014)
• van der Schaft, A. J. & Maschke, B. M. Hamiltonian formulation of distributed-parameter systems with boundary energy flow. Journal of Geometry and Physics 42, 166–194 (2002) – 10.1016/s0393-0440(01)00083-3
• Venkatraman, A. & van der Schaft, A. Energy Shaping of Port-Hamiltonian Systems by Using Alternate Passive Input-Output Pairs. European Journal of Control 16, 665–677 (2010) – 10.3166/ejc.16.665-677
• eloísa, A new passivity property of linear rlc circuits with application to power shaping stabilization. Proceeding of the 2004 American Control Conference (2004)
• García-Canseco, E., Jeltsema, D., Ortega, R. & Scherpen, J. M. A. Power-based control of physical systems. Automatica 46, 127–132 (2010) – 10.1016/j.automatica.2009.10.012
• Jeltsema, D., Ortega, R. & Scherpen, J. M. A. On passivity and power-balance inequalities of nonlinear rlc circuits. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I 50, 1174–1179 (2003) – 10.1109/tcsi.2003.816332
• Jeltsema, D., Ortega, R. & Scherpen, J. M. A. On passivity and power-balance inequalities of nonlinear rlc circuits. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I 50, 1174–1179 (2003) – 10.1109/tcsi.2003.816332
• Jeltsema, D. & Schaft, A. van der. Pseudo-gradient and Lagrangian boundary control system formulation of electromagnetic fields. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40, 11627–11643 (2007) – 10.1088/1751-8113/40/38/013
• Jeltsema, D., Ortega, R. & Scherpen, J. M. A. An Energy-Balancing Perspective of Interconnection and Damping Assignment Control of Nonlinear Systems 1. IFAC Proceedings Volumes 36, 105–110 (2003) – 10.1016/s1474-6670(17)38875-4
• Forni, F., Sepulchre, R. & van der Schaft, A. J. On differential passivity of physical systems. 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 6580–6585 (2013) doi:10.1109/cdc.2013.6760930 – 10.1109/cdc.2013.6760930
• Blankenstein, G. Geometric modeling of nonlinear RLC circuits. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I 52, 396–404 (2005) – 10.1109/tcsi.2004.840481
• Brayton, R. K. & Moser, J. K. A theory of nonlinear networks. I. Quart. Appl. Math. 22, 1–33 (1964) – 10.1090/qam/169746